Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
AISI 3310 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
AISI 3310 is typically used for aircraft gears, heavily stressed case hardened parts, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
AISI 3310 is defined under AISI, originating from United States, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, AISI 3310 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 66.2% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
AISI 3310
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
900–1100 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Case Hardness HRC
60–65
Not specified
Elongation
≥10%
10-14 %
Yield Strength
Not specified
400-600 MPa
Hardness
Not specified
60-64 HRC
Typical Applications
AISI 3310
Aircraft gears, heavily stressed case hardened parts
AISI 3310 specifies Ni which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
UNI 11234 100Cr6 specifies Si, P, S which are not specified for AISI 3310.
Can AISI 3310 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
AISI 3310 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between AISI 3310 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
AISI 3310 specifies Ni which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6. UNI 11234 100Cr6 specifies Si, P, S which are not specified for AISI 3310.
Can AISI 3310 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
AISI 3310 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.