Close Alternative — 71.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
AISI 4340 and GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo (GB/T 3077:2015) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
AISI 4340 is typically used for aircraft parts, heavy duty gears, crankshafts, high tensile bolts, while GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo is commonly used for hot-rolled or forged structural alloy steel bars.
AISI 4340 is defined under AISI, originating from United States, while GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China.
As per chemical composition, AISI 4340 vs GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo is a 94.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 25%.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 71.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
AISI 4340
GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo
Condition
Quenched & Tempered
Quenched and tempered, test sample 25 mm; hardness is for bars delivered annealed or high temperature tempered
Tensile Strength
1000–1200 MPa
>=1050 MPa
Yield Strength
≥830 MPa
>=980 MPa
Elongation
≥12%
>=12%
Hardness
285–341 HB
<=269 HB
Typical Applications
AISI 4340
Aircraft parts, heavy duty gears, crankshafts, high tensile bolts
GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo
Hot-rolled or forged structural alloy steel bars
Key Differences
GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo specifies P, S, Cu which are not specified for AISI 4340.
Can AISI 4340 Be Substituted With GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo?
AISI 4340 and GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between AISI 4340 and GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo?
GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo specifies P, S, Cu which are not specified for AISI 4340.
Can AISI 4340 be substituted with GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo?
AISI 4340 and GB/T 3077 40CrNi2Mo are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.