Post Stock Login Register

AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR vs EN 10025-5 S355J0WP

Minimal Match — 35% match based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.

AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR (AS/NZS 3678:2016) and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP (EN 10025-5:2019) are both steel grades. Both fall under the Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering) category. AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR is typically used for weather-resistant (corrosion-resistant) structural steel; exposed bridge and structural applications requiring atmospheric corrosion resistance, while EN 10025-5 S355J0WP is commonly used for high-phosphorus weathering steel for enhanced patina formation; containers, smokestacks, freight wagons, silos, pylons, bridges, architectural exposed structures. AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand, while EN 10025-5 S355J0WP is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.

As per chemical composition, AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR vs EN 10025-5 S355J0WP is a 73.8% match. As per mechanical properties, the match is 29.2%. Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.

Frequently Compared With AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR:
CSA G40.21 350A ASTM A588 JIS G3114 SMA400 EN 10025-5 S355J2W EN 10025-5 S355J2WP CSA G40.21 50W ASTM A588 Grade A CSA G40.21 260WT ASTM A709 Grade HPS 70W CSA G40.21 480A ASTM A588 Grade B EN 10025-5 S235J2W
Match Breakdown
CHEMISTRY MATCH
73.8%
MECHANICAL MATCH
29.2%
OVERALL
35%
Specifications
Property AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
Standard AS/NZS 3678:2016 EN 10025-5:2019
Category Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering) Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering)
C (%) <=0.20 <=0.12
Mn (%) <=1.70 <=1.0
Si (%) <=0.50 <=0.75
P (%) <=0.035 0.06-0.15
S (%) <=0.035 <=0.035
Cu (%) 0.25-0.55 0.25-0.55
Cr (%) 0.40-0.80 0.30-1.25
Ni (%) <=0.65 Not specified
N (%) Not specified <=0.012
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
Tensile Strength 480-620 MPa 470-630 MPa
Yield Strength 350 MPa min >=355 MPa
Elongation 20% min >=22%
Condition Not specified Nominal thickness up to 16 mm for yield, 3 to 100 mm for tensile, 3 to 40 mm for elongation (Lo = 5.65 sqrt(S0), longitudinal); transverse values are lower, see blocks
Typical Applications
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR
Weather-resistant (corrosion-resistant) structural steel; exposed bridge and structural applications requiring atmospheric corrosion resistance
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
High-phosphorus weathering steel for enhanced patina formation; containers, smokestacks, freight wagons, silos, pylons, bridges, architectural exposed structures
Key Differences
Can AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR Be Substituted With EN 10025-5 S355J0WP?
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
Forms & Sizes Available on M-EX
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR
Plate → (2 listings)
Thickness: 10–10 mm (0.39–0.39 in)
Width: 1500–1500 mm (59.06–59.06 in)
Length: 2500–2800 mm (98.43–110.24 in)
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
Plate → (2 listings)
Thickness: 10–10 mm (0.39–0.39 in)
Width: 1500–1500 mm (59.06–59.06 in)
Length: 2900–4300 mm (114.17–169.29 in)
On M-EX Right Now
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR
2 active listings and RFQs →
EN 10025-5 S355J0WP
2 active listings and RFQs →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP?
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR specifies Ni which is not specified for EN 10025-5 S355J0WP. EN 10025-5 S355J0WP specifies N which is not specified for AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR.
Can AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR be substituted with EN 10025-5 S355J0WP?
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 350WR and EN 10025-5 S355J0WP share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.