Related Material — 64.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 (AS/NZS 3678:2016) and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 is typically used for heavy structural fabrication, crane booms, mining machinery, earthmoving equipment, structural columns., while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing.
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 vs AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is a 96.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 64.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Yield Strength
400 MPa min (t<=12mm)
300 MPa min
Tensile Strength
~520 MPa min (approx, equivalent to ASTM A572 Gr.60)
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing
Can AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
AS/NZS 3678 Grade 400 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.