Related Material — 59.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A105 (ASTM A105) and GB/T 700 Q235 (GB/T 700-2006) are both steel grades.
ASTM A105 is classified under Carbon Steel, while GB/T 700 Q235 is classified under Structural Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below.
ASTM A105 is typically used for flanges, fittings, valves, pressure piping components, forged pressure vessel parts, while GB/T 700 Q235 is commonly used for general structural fabrication, bridges, buildings.
ASTM A105 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while GB/T 700 Q235 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A105 vs GB/T 700 Q235 is a 89.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 59.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A105
GB/T 700 Q235
Tensile Strength
485 MPa min
375–500 MPa
Yield Strength
250 MPa min
≥235 MPa
Elongation
≥22%
≥26%
Hardness
≤197 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A105
Flanges, fittings, valves, pressure piping components, forged pressure vessel parts
GB/T 700 Q235
General structural fabrication, bridges, buildings
Key Differences
Different category: ASTM A105 is Carbon Steel, GB/T 700 Q235 is Structural Steel.
Can ASTM A105 Be Substituted With GB/T 700 Q235?
ASTM A105 and GB/T 700 Q235 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A105 and GB/T 700 Q235?
Different category: ASTM A105 is Carbon Steel, GB/T 700 Q235 is Structural Steel.
Can ASTM A105 be substituted with GB/T 700 Q235?
ASTM A105 and GB/T 700 Q235 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.