ASTM A240/A240M N08031 vs EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7
Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A240/A240M N08031 (ASTM A240/A240M:2025) and EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A240/A240M N08031 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A240/A240M N08031 vs EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7 is a 69.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A240/A240M N08031
EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7
Tensile Strength
>=650 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=276 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=40%
Not specified
Condition
Plate, sheet and strip; yield by 0.2 percent offset
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A240/A240M N08031
Pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip)
EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7
Not documented
Can ASTM A240/A240M N08031 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7?
ASTM A240/A240M N08031 and EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A240/A240M N08031 and EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can ASTM A240/A240M N08031 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7?
ASTM A240/A240M N08031 and EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoCuN20-18-7 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.