Related Material — 68.4% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A240/A240M S30600 (ASTM A240/A240M:2025) and BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 (BS 970 (Part 1):1983) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A240/A240M S30600 is typically used for pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip), while BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 is commonly used for austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel for mechanical and allied engineering purposes (table 14, with table 15 for the cold drawn condition)..
ASTM A240/A240M S30600 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A240/A240M S30600 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 is a 68.4% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 68.4%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A240/A240M S30600
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13
Tensile Strength
>=540 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=240 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=40%
Not specified
Condition
Plate, sheet and strip; yield by 0.2 percent offset
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A240/A240M S30600
Pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip)
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13
Austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel for mechanical and allied engineering purposes (Table 14, with Table 15 for the cold drawn condition).
Key Differences
ASTM A240/A240M S30600 specifies Cu which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13.
Can ASTM A240/A240M S30600 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13?
ASTM A240/A240M S30600 and BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A240/A240M S30600 and BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13?
ASTM A240/A240M S30600 specifies Cu which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13.
Can ASTM A240/A240M S30600 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13?
ASTM A240/A240M S30600 and BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.