ASTM A240/A240M S32950 vs EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2
Close Alternative — 73.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A240/A240M S32950 (ASTM A240/A240M:2025) and EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A240/A240M S32950 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A240/A240M S32950 vs EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2 is a 73.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 73.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A240/A240M S32950
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2
Tensile Strength
>=690 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=485 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=15%
Not specified
Hardness
<=293 HB
Not specified
Condition
Plate, sheet and strip; yield by 0.2 percent offset
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A240/A240M S32950
Pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip)
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2
Not documented
Can ASTM A240/A240M S32950 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2?
ASTM A240/A240M S32950 and EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between ASTM A240/A240M S32950 and EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can ASTM A240/A240M S32950 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2?
ASTM A240/A240M S32950 and EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMoN27-5-2 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.