Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A240/A240M S82013 (ASTM A240/A240M:2025) and BS 970 EN61 (BS 970:1955) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A240/A240M S82013 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while BS 970 EN61 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A240/A240M S82013 vs BS 970 EN61 is a 70.2% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A240/A240M S82013
BS 970 EN61
Tensile Strength
>=620 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=450 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=30%
Not specified
Hardness
<=293 HB
Not specified
Condition
Plate, sheet and strip; yield by 0.2 percent offset
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A240/A240M S82013
Pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip)
BS 970 EN61
Not documented
Key Differences
ASTM A240/A240M S82013 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for BS 970 EN61.
Can ASTM A240/A240M S82013 Be Substituted With BS 970 EN61?
ASTM A240/A240M S82013 and BS 970 EN61 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A240/A240M S82013 and BS 970 EN61?
ASTM A240/A240M S82013 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for BS 970 EN61.
Can ASTM A240/A240M S82013 be substituted with BS 970 EN61?
ASTM A240/A240M S82013 and BS 970 EN61 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.