Related Material — 67.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A276/A276M S20162 (ASTM A276/A276M:2017) and EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A276/A276M S20162 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A276/A276M S20162 vs EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8 is a 67.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 67.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A276/A276M S20162
EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8
Tensile Strength
>=690 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=345 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=50%
Not specified
Condition
Condition A (Annealed), hot-finished or cold-finished, all sizes (first row printed)
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A276/A276M S20162
Stainless steel bars and shapes (hot-finished or cold-finished)
EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8
Not documented
Can ASTM A276/A276M S20162 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8?
ASTM A276/A276M S20162 and EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A276/A276M S20162 and EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can ASTM A276/A276M S20162 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8?
ASTM A276/A276M S20162 and EN 10088-1 X10CrNi18-8 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.