Minimal Match — 48.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A681 A3 (ASTM A681:2008) and GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1 (GB/T 1299-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
ASTM A681 A3 is typically used for tools, dies and fixtures (clause 1.2), while GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1 is commonly used for die casting dies, forging dies, extrusion tools.
ASTM A681 A3 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A681 A3 vs GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1 is a 72.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 48.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A681 A3
GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1
Hardness
<=229 HB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed (maximum Brinell hardness)
Not specified
Hardness HRC (hardened)
Not specified
42–54
Hardness HB (annealed)
Not specified
≤235
Typical Applications
ASTM A681 A3
Tools, dies and fixtures (clause 1.2)
GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1
Die casting dies, forging dies, extrusion tools
Key Differences
ASTM A681 A3 specifies P, S which are not specified for GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1.
Can ASTM A681 A3 Be Substituted With GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1?
ASTM A681 A3 and GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A681 A3 and GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1?
ASTM A681 A3 specifies P, S which are not specified for GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1.
Can ASTM A681 A3 be substituted with GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1?
ASTM A681 A3 and GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.