Related Material — 65% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A681 L6 (ASTM A681:2008) and SAE J404 4340 (SAE J404:2009) are both steel grades.
ASTM A681 L6 is classified under Tool & Die Steels, while SAE J404 4340 is classified under Alloy Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below.
ASTM A681 L6 is typically used for tools, dies and fixtures (clause 1.2), while SAE J404 4340 is commonly used for aircraft parts, heavy duty gears, crankshafts.
ASTM A681 L6 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while SAE J404 4340 is defined under SAE International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A681 L6 vs SAE J404 4340 is a 68.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A681 L6
SAE J404 4340
Hardness
<=235 HB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed (maximum Brinell hardness)
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A681 L6
Tools, dies and fixtures (clause 1.2)
SAE J404 4340
Aircraft parts, heavy duty gears, crankshafts
Key Differences
Different category: ASTM A681 L6 is Tool & Die Steels, SAE J404 4340 is Alloy Steel.
Can ASTM A681 L6 Be Substituted With SAE J404 4340?
ASTM A681 L6 and SAE J404 4340 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A681 L6 and SAE J404 4340?
Different category: ASTM A681 L6 is Tool & Die Steels, SAE J404 4340 is Alloy Steel.
Can ASTM A681 L6 be substituted with SAE J404 4340?
ASTM A681 L6 and SAE J404 4340 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.