Strong Match — 95.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 302 (ASTM A959:2011) and BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31 (BS 970 (Part 1):1983) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 302 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31 is commonly used for austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel for mechanical and allied engineering purposes (table 14, with table 15 for the cold drawn condition)..
ASTM A959 302 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 302 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31 is a 95.6% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a strong match overall at 95.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 302
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31
Austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel for mechanical and allied engineering purposes (Table 14, with Table 15 for the cold drawn condition).
Key Differences
ASTM A959 302 specifies N which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31.
Can ASTM A959 302 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31?
ASTM A959 302 and BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31 is often considered as a substitute for ASTM A959 302 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 302 and BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31?
ASTM A959 302 specifies N which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31.
Can ASTM A959 302 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31?
ASTM A959 302 and BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that BS 970 (Part 1) 302S31 is often considered as a substitute for ASTM A959 302 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.