Post Stock Login Register

ASTM A959 622 vs ASTM A959 660

Related Material — 69.9% match based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.

ASTM A959 622 (ASTM A959:2011) and ASTM A959 660 (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades. Both fall under the Stainless Steel category. ASTM A959 622 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while ASTM A959 660 is commonly used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1). ASTM A959 622 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while ASTM A959 660 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.

As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 622 vs ASTM A959 660 is a 70.1% match. Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored. Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.

Frequently Compared With ASTM A959 622:
IS 1570 (Part 7) 11Cr17Ni13W3TiH IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoH ASTM A959 .- GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 EN 10088-1 1.4845 IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12Ni2Mo EN 10088-1 1.4006 EN 10088-1 1.4301 EN 10088-1 1.4401 IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 GOST 5632 08X18H10
Match Breakdown
CHEMISTRY MATCH
70.1%
MECHANICAL MATCH
No shared data
OVERALL
69.9%
Specifications
Property ASTM A959 622 ASTM A959 660
Standard ASTM A959:2011 ASTM A959:2011
Category Stainless Steel Stainless Steel
Al (%) <=0.35 <=0.35
B (%) 0.001-0.010 0.001-0.010
C (%) <=0.08 <=0.08
Cr (%) 12.0-15.0 13.5-16.0
Cu (%) <=0.50 Not specified
Mn (%) <=1.50 <=2.00
Mo (%) 2.5-3.5 1.00-1.50
Ni (%) 24.0-28.0 24.0-27.0
P (%) <=0.040 <=0.040
S (%) <=0.030 <=0.030
Si (%) <=1.00 <=1.00
Ti (%) 1.55-2.00 1.90-2.35
V (%) Not specified 0.10-0.50
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 622
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
ASTM A959 660
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
Key Differences
Can ASTM A959 622 Be Substituted With ASTM A959 660?
ASTM A959 622 and ASTM A959 660 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
On M-EX Right Now
ASTM A959 622
0 active listings and RFQs →
ASTM A959 660
0 active listings and RFQs →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between ASTM A959 622 and ASTM A959 660?
ASTM A959 622 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A959 660. ASTM A959 660 specifies V which is not specified for ASTM A959 622.
Can ASTM A959 622 be substituted with ASTM A959 660?
ASTM A959 622 and ASTM A959 660 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.