ASTM A959 662 vs EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2

Related Material — 63.8% match based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.

ASTM A959 662 (ASTM A959:2011) and EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 (EN 10088-3:2014) are both steel grades. Both fall under the Stainless Steel category. ASTM A959 662 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 is commonly used for general purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products. ASTM A959 662 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.

As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 662 vs EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 is a 63.8% match. Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored. Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 63.8%.

Frequently Compared With ASTM A959 662:
GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 EN 10088-1 1.4401 EN 10088-1 1.4845 IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12Ni2Mo IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr13H GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 GOST 5632 08X18H10 EN 10088-1 1.4006 EN 10088-1 1.4301 IS 1570 (Part 7) 11Cr17Ni13W3TiH IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoH IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH
Match Breakdown
CHEMISTRY MATCH
63.8%
MECHANICAL MATCH
No shared data
OVERALL
63.8%
Specifications
Property ASTM A959 662 EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2
Standard ASTM A959:2011 EN 10088-3:2014
Category Stainless Steel Stainless Steel
Al (%) <=0.35 <=0.35
B (%) 0.001-0.010 0.0010-0.010
C (%) <=0.08 <=0.08
Cr (%) 12.0-15.0 13.0-16.0
Cu (%) <=0.50 Not specified
Mn (%) 0.40-1.00 1.00-2.00
Mo (%) 2.0-3.5 1.00-1.50
Ni (%) 24.0-28.0 24.0-27.0
P (%) <=0.040 <=0.025
S (%) <=0.030 <=0.015
Si (%) 0.40-1.00 <=1.00
Ti (%) 1.80-2.10 1.90-2.30
V (%) Not specified 0.10-0.50
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property ASTM A959 662 EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2
Tensile Strength Not specified <=700 MPa
Yield Strength Not specified >=250 MPa
Elongation Not specified >=35%
Hardness Not specified <=212 HB
Condition Not specified Solution annealed (+AT), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 50 mm; hardness for guidance only
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 662
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
Key Differences
Can ASTM A959 662 Be Substituted With EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2?
ASTM A959 662 and EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
On M-EX Right Now
ASTM A959 662
0 active listings and RFQs →
EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2
0 active listings and RFQs →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between ASTM A959 662 and EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2?
ASTM A959 662 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2. EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 specifies V which is not specified for ASTM A959 662.
Can ASTM A959 662 be substituted with EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2?
ASTM A959 662 and EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.