Related Material — 63.8% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 662 (ASTM A959:2011) and EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 (EN 10088-3:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 662 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 is commonly used for general purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products.
ASTM A959 662 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 662 vs EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 is a 63.8% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 63.8%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A959 662
EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2
Tensile Strength
Not specified
<=700 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=250 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=35%
Hardness
Not specified
<=212 HB
Condition
Not specified
Solution annealed (+AT), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 50 mm; hardness for guidance only
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 662
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
Key Differences
ASTM A959 662 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2.
EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 specifies V which is not specified for ASTM A959 662.
Can ASTM A959 662 Be Substituted With EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2?
ASTM A959 662 and EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 662 and EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2?
ASTM A959 662 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2. EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 specifies V which is not specified for ASTM A959 662.
Can ASTM A959 662 be substituted with EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2?
ASTM A959 662 and EN 10088-3 X5NiCrTiMoVB25-15-2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.