Close Alternative — 77.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 S20400 (ASTM A959:2011) and EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 S20400 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 S20400 vs EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 is a 77.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 77.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 S20400
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A959 S20400.
Can ASTM A959 S20400 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5?
ASTM A959 S20400 and EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 S20400 and EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5?
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A959 S20400.
Can ASTM A959 S20400 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5?
ASTM A959 S20400 and EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.