Close Alternative — 71.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 S32003 (ASTM A959:2011) and ASTM A240/A240M S82031 (ASTM A240/A240M:2025) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 S32003 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while ASTM A240/A240M S82031 is commonly used for pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip).
ASTM A959 S32003 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while ASTM A240/A240M S82031 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 S32003 vs ASTM A240/A240M S82031 is a 71.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 71.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A959 S32003
ASTM A240/A240M S82031
Tensile Strength
Not specified
>=700 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=500 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=35%
Hardness
Not specified
<=31 HRC
Condition
Not specified
t <= 0.187 in. [5.00 mm] (first condition printed); yield by 0.2 percent offset
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 S32003
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
ASTM A240/A240M S82031
Pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip)
Key Differences
ASTM A240/A240M S82031 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A959 S32003.
Can ASTM A959 S32003 Be Substituted With ASTM A240/A240M S82031?
ASTM A959 S32003 and ASTM A240/A240M S82031 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 S32003 and ASTM A240/A240M S82031?
ASTM A240/A240M S82031 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A959 S32003.
Can ASTM A959 S32003 be substituted with ASTM A240/A240M S82031?
ASTM A959 S32003 and ASTM A240/A240M S82031 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.