Close Alternative — 72.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 S32050 (ASTM A959:2011) and ASTM A276/A276M S32053 (ASTM A276/A276M:2017) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 S32050 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while ASTM A276/A276M S32053 is commonly used for stainless steel bars and shapes (hot-finished or cold-finished).
ASTM A959 S32050 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while ASTM A276/A276M S32053 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 S32050 vs ASTM A276/A276M S32053 is a 72.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 72.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A959 S32050
ASTM A276/A276M S32053
Tensile Strength
Not specified
>=640 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=295 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=40%
Hardness
Not specified
<=217 HB
Condition
Not specified
Condition A (Annealed), hot-finished or cold-finished, all sizes (first row printed)
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 S32050
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
ASTM A276/A276M S32053
Stainless steel bars and shapes (hot-finished or cold-finished)
Key Differences
ASTM A959 S32050 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A276/A276M S32053.
Can ASTM A959 S32050 Be Substituted With ASTM A276/A276M S32053?
ASTM A959 S32050 and ASTM A276/A276M S32053 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 S32050 and ASTM A276/A276M S32053?
ASTM A959 S32050 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A276/A276M S32053.
Can ASTM A959 S32050 be substituted with ASTM A276/A276M S32053?
ASTM A959 S32050 and ASTM A276/A276M S32053 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.