Close Alternative — 73% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 S32053 (ASTM A959:2011) and EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5 (EN 10088-2:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 S32053 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5 is commonly used for general purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip.
ASTM A959 S32053 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 S32053 vs EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5 is a 73% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 73%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A959 S32053
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5
Tensile Strength
Not specified
600-800 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=290 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=40%
Condition
Not specified
Solution annealed (+AT), hot rolled plate, up to 75 mm thick; Yield Strength is Rp0.2 (transverse), Elongation is A80 for under 3 mm thick
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 S32053
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5
General purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip
Key Differences
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A959 S32053.
Can ASTM A959 S32053 Be Substituted With EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5?
ASTM A959 S32053 and EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 S32053 and EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5?
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A959 S32053.
Can ASTM A959 S32053 be substituted with EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5?
ASTM A959 S32053 and EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCuN25-25-5 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.