Strong Match — 100% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 XM-29 (ASTM A959:2011) and EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3 (EN 10088-3:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 XM-29 is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3 is commonly used for general purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products.
ASTM A959 XM-29 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 XM-29 vs EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3 is a 100% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a strong match overall at 100%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A959 XM-29
EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3
Tensile Strength
Not specified
690-830 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=380 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=30%
Hardness
Not specified
<=220 HB
Condition
Not specified
Solution annealed (+AT), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 160 mm; Yield Strength is Rp0.2, Elongation is A (longitudinal), hardness for guidance only
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 XM-29
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
Can ASTM A959 XM-29 Be Substituted With EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3?
ASTM A959 XM-29 and EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3 is often considered as a substitute for ASTM A959 XM-29 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 XM-29 and EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can ASTM A959 XM-29 be substituted with EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3?
ASTM A959 XM-29 and EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that EN 10088-3 X6CrMnNiN18-13-3 is often considered as a substitute for ASTM A959 XM-29 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.