Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 4659 BD2 (BS 4659:1989) and IS 3748 XT215Cr12 (IS 3748:1990) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
BS 4659 BD2 is typically used for blanking dies, forming dies, thread rolling dies, while IS 3748 XT215Cr12 is commonly used for cold work tools and dies for blanking, trimming, chipping and shearing.
BS 4659 BD2 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while IS 3748 XT215Cr12 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, BS 4659 BD2 vs IS 3748 XT215Cr12 is a 71.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 100%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 4659 BD2
IS 3748 XT215Cr12
Hardness HRC (hardened)
58–62
Not specified
Hardness HB (annealed)
≤255
Not specified
Hardness
Not specified
<=255 HB
Condition
Not specified
Annealed (maximum Brinell hardness)
Typical Applications
BS 4659 BD2
Blanking dies, forming dies, thread rolling dies
IS 3748 XT215Cr12
Cold work tools and dies for blanking, trimming, chipping and shearing
Key Differences
IS 3748 XT215Cr12 specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 4659 BD2.
Can BS 4659 BD2 Be Substituted With IS 3748 XT215Cr12?
BS 4659 BD2 and IS 3748 XT215Cr12 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 4659 BD2 and IS 3748 XT215Cr12?
IS 3748 XT215Cr12 specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 4659 BD2.
Can BS 4659 BD2 be substituted with IS 3748 XT215Cr12?
BS 4659 BD2 and IS 3748 XT215Cr12 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.