Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) and GOST 4543 12HN3A (GOST 4543-2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 is typically used for case hardening steel (section four), while GOST 4543 12HN3A is commonly used for used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components..
BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 is defined under British Standards (BS) (United Kingdom).
As per chemical composition, BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 vs GOST 4543 12HN3A is a 70.8% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Tensile Strength
Not specified
850-1050 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
685 MPa min
Elongation
Not specified
11% min
Hardness
Not specified
58-62 HRC (case)
Typical Applications
BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17
Case hardening steel (section four)
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components.
Key Differences
GOST 4543 12HN3A specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17.
Can BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 Be Substituted With GOST 4543 12HN3A?
BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 and GOST 4543 12HN3A?
GOST 4543 12HN3A specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17.
Can BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 be substituted with GOST 4543 12HN3A?
BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.