BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6
Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 is a 59.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6
Condition
Case hardened, 19 mm test bar
Not specified
Tensile Strength
930 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
10 % min
Not specified
Typical Applications
BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23
Case hardening steel (section four)
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 specifies Si, Cr which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23.
Can BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6?
BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 specifies Si, Cr which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23.
Can BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6?
BS 970 (Part 1) 665M23 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Cr20Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.