Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 EN36 (BS 970:1955) and BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
BS 970 EN36 is typically used for case hardened gears, cams, shafts, while BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 is commonly used for case hardening steel (section four).
BS 970 EN36 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, BS 970 EN36 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 is a 78.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 EN36
BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17
Tensile Strength
775–930 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
≥585 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
≥15%
Not specified
Case Hardness HRC
58–62
Not specified
Typical Applications
BS 970 EN36
Case hardened gears, cams, shafts
BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17
Case hardening steel (section four)
Key Differences
BS 970 EN36 specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17.
Can BS 970 EN36 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17?
BS 970 EN36 and BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 EN36 and BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17?
BS 970 EN36 specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17.
Can BS 970 EN36 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17?
BS 970 EN36 and BS 970 (Part 1) 637H17 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.