Related Material — 55.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 EN36B (BS 970:1955) and GOST 4543 12HN3A (GOST 4543-2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
BS 970 EN36B is typically used for case hardened gears and heavily loaded components, while GOST 4543 12HN3A is commonly used for used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components..
BS 970 EN36B is defined under British Standards (BS) (United Kingdom).
As per chemical composition, BS 970 EN36B vs GOST 4543 12HN3A is a 82.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 55.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 EN36B
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Tensile Strength
≥1004 MPa (65 tons/sq in, converted)
850-1050 MPa
Elongation
≥13%
11% min
Condition
Core, after heat treatment (lowest-strength condition of the standard)
Not specified
Yield Strength
Not specified
685 MPa min
Hardness
Not specified
58-62 HRC (case)
Typical Applications
BS 970 EN36B
Case hardened gears and heavily loaded components
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components.
Key Differences
BS 970 EN36B specifies S, P which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can BS 970 EN36B Be Substituted With GOST 4543 12HN3A?
BS 970 EN36B and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 EN36B and GOST 4543 12HN3A?
BS 970 EN36B specifies S, P which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can BS 970 EN36B be substituted with GOST 4543 12HN3A?
BS 970 EN36B and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.