Related Material — 66.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 EN36C (BS 970:1955) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
BS 970 EN36C is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, BS 970 EN36C vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 is a 66.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 66.3%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 EN36C
IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6
Tensile Strength
≥1004 MPa (65 tons/sq in, converted)
Not specified
Elongation
≥13%
Not specified
Condition
Core, after heat treatment (lowest-strength condition of the standard)
Not specified
Typical Applications
BS 970 EN36C
Used for gears, camshafts, pinions, heavy-duty shafts, aerospace transmission parts, and worm drives.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
BS 970 EN36C specifies S, P which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6.
Can BS 970 EN36C Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6?
BS 970 EN36C and IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 EN36C and IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6?
BS 970 EN36C specifies S, P which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6.
Can BS 970 EN36C be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6?
BS 970 EN36C and IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.