Related Material — 56.7% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 EN7 (BS 970:1955) and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 (IS 1570 (Part 3):1979) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Free Machining Steel category.
BS 970 EN7 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, BS 970 EN7 vs IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 is a 82.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 5.4%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 56.7%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 EN7
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10
Tensile Strength
463-618 MPa (30-40 tons/sq in, converted)
370-490 MPa
Elongation
≥12%
>=24%
Condition
size (diameter or width across flats) Over 1 3/4 to 2 1/2 in (lowest-strength condition of the standard)
Hot rolled or normalized bars, billets and forgings (Table 2), ruling sections up to 150 mm
Typical Applications
BS 970 EN7
Bright bars for machining. A semi-free cutting modification of En 6 for certain restricted applications.
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10
Not documented
Can BS 970 EN7 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10?
BS 970 EN7 and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 EN7 and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can BS 970 EN7 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10?
BS 970 EN7 and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.