Minimal Match — 53% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 EN8M (BS 970:1955) and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 (IS 1570 (Part 3):1979) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Free Machining Steel category.
BS 970 EN8M is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, BS 970 EN8M vs IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 is a 79.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 53%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 EN8M
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10
Tensile Strength
≥541 MPa (35 tons/sq in, converted)
370-490 MPa
Yield Strength
≥278 MPa (18 tons/sq in, converted)
Not specified
Elongation
≥20%
>=24%
Hardness
152-207 HB
Not specified
Condition
Normalised, ruling section 6 in (lowest-strength condition of the standard)
Hot rolled or normalized bars, billets and forgings (Table 2), ruling sections up to 150 mm
Typical Applications
BS 970 EN8M
High volume turned parts, automotive components
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10
Not documented
Can BS 970 EN8M Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10?
BS 970 EN8M and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 EN8M and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can BS 970 EN8M be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10?
BS 970 EN8M and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.