Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 EN9K (BS 970:1955) and BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
BS 970 EN9K is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, BS 970 EN9K vs BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 is a 80% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 EN9K
BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04
Tensile Strength
≥695 MPa (45 tons/sq in, converted)
Not specified
Yield Strength
≥355 MPa (23 tons/sq in, converted)
Not specified
Elongation
≥18%
Not specified
Hardness
201-255 HB
Not specified
Condition
Normalised, ruling section 4 in (lowest-strength condition of the standard)
Not specified
Typical Applications
BS 970 EN9K
Not documented
BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04
As-rolled, or as-rolled and softened, steel (section two)
Key Differences
BS 970 EN9K specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04.
Can BS 970 EN9K Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04?
BS 970 EN9K and BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 EN9K and BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04?
BS 970 EN9K specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04.
Can BS 970 EN9K be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04?
BS 970 EN9K and BS 970 (Part 1) 040A04 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.