Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
DIN 1654-2 C8C (DIN 1654-2:1989-10) and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
DIN 1654-2 C8C is typically used for wire drawing, cold heading, nails, while BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is commonly used for case hardening steel (section four).
DIN 1654-2 C8C is defined under Deutsches Institut fur Normung (DIN), originating from Germany, while BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, DIN 1654-2 C8C vs BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is a 89% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
DIN 1654-2 C8C
BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10
Tensile Strength
300–420 MPa
430 MPa min
Elongation
≥30%
18 % min
Condition
Not specified
Case hardened, 19 mm test bar
Typical Applications
DIN 1654-2 C8C
Wire drawing, cold heading, nails
BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10
Case hardening steel (section four)
Key Differences
DIN 1654-2 C8C specifies S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10.
Can DIN 1654-2 C8C Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
DIN 1654-2 C8C and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between DIN 1654-2 C8C and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
DIN 1654-2 C8C specifies S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10.
Can DIN 1654-2 C8C be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
DIN 1654-2 C8C and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.