Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
DIN 17111 35S20 (DIN 17111:1980) and SAE J403 1117 (SAE J403:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Free Machining Steel category.
DIN 17111 35S20 is typically used for high volume turned parts, automotive components, while SAE J403 1117 is commonly used for chemistry-only grade; product scope as listed in the composition notes.
DIN 17111 35S20 is defined under Deutsches Institut fur Normung (DIN), originating from Germany, while SAE J403 1117 is defined under SAE International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, DIN 17111 35S20 vs SAE J403 1117 is a 78.5% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
DIN 17111 35S20
SAE J403 1117
Tensile Strength
500–700 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
≥12%
Not specified
Hardness
152–207 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
DIN 17111 35S20
High volume turned parts, automotive components
SAE J403 1117
Chemistry-only grade; product scope as listed in the composition notes
Can DIN 17111 35S20 Be Substituted With SAE J403 1117?
DIN 17111 35S20 and SAE J403 1117 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between DIN 17111 35S20 and SAE J403 1117?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can DIN 17111 35S20 be substituted with SAE J403 1117?
DIN 17111 35S20 and SAE J403 1117 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.