Minimal Match — 38.7% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6 (DIN 17210:1986) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6 is defined under Deutsches Institut fur Normung (DIN), originating from Germany, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6 vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 58% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 38.7%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Tensile Strength
1000–1200 MPa
380-550 MPa
Case Hardness HRC
58–63
Not specified
Core Hardness HB
280–340
Not specified
Elongation
≥9%
>=19%
Yield Strength
Not specified
225 MPa min
Izod Impact
Not specified
60 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Condition
Not specified
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Typical Applications
DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6
Heavy duty gears, shafts, cams, axles, case hardened transmission components
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Can DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6 Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6 be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
DIN 17210 18CrNiMo6 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.