Related Material — 65% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10083-2 C40 (EN 10083-2:2006) and SAE J404 4340 (SAE J404:2009) are both steel grades.
EN 10083-2 C40 is classified under Carbon Steel, while SAE J404 4340 is classified under Alloy Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below.
EN 10083-2 C40 is typically used for shafts, gears, bolts, machine parts, agricultural equipment, while SAE J404 4340 is commonly used for aircraft parts, heavy duty gears, crankshafts.
EN 10083-2 C40 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while SAE J404 4340 is defined under SAE International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10083-2 C40 vs SAE J404 4340 is a 65.8% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10083-2 C40
SAE J404 4340
Condition
Quenched and tempered (+QT), ruling section d <= 16 mm
Different category: EN 10083-2 C40 is Carbon Steel, SAE J404 4340 is Alloy Steel.
EN 10083-2 C40 specifies Cr+Mo+Ni which is not specified for SAE J404 4340.
Can EN 10083-2 C40 Be Substituted With SAE J404 4340?
EN 10083-2 C40 and SAE J404 4340 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10083-2 C40 and SAE J404 4340?
Different category: EN 10083-2 C40 is Carbon Steel, SAE J404 4340 is Alloy Steel. EN 10083-2 C40 specifies Cr+Mo+Ni which is not specified for SAE J404 4340.
Can EN 10083-2 C40 be substituted with SAE J404 4340?
EN 10083-2 C40 and SAE J404 4340 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.