Close Alternative — 81.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 S355J2 (EN 10025-2:2019) and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 S355J2 is typically used for used for bridges, offshore structures, cranes, construction equipment, structural frames, and heavy fabrication., while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing.
EN 10025-2 S355J2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 S355J2 vs AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is a 93.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 56.1%.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 81.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 S355J2
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Tensile Strength
470-630 MPa
440-600 MPa
Yield Strength
>=355 MPa
300 MPa min
Elongation
>=22%
22% min
Condition
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10025-2 S355J2
Used for bridges, offshore structures, cranes, construction equipment, structural frames, and heavy fabrication.
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing
Key Differences
EN 10025-2 S355J2 specifies Cu which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can EN 10025-2 S355J2 Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-2 S355J2 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 S355J2 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-2 S355J2 specifies Cu which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can EN 10025-2 S355J2 be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-2 S355J2 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.