Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-3 S420NL (EN 10025-3:2019) and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-3 S420NL is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-3 S420NL vs AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is a 61.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 11.1%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-3 S420NL
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Tensile Strength
520-680 MPa
440-600 MPa
Yield Strength
>=420 MPa
300 MPa min
Elongation
>=19%
22% min
Condition
Normalized or normalized rolled (N), nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile strength up to 100 mm), Table 4
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10025-3 S420NL
Not documented
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing
Key Differences
EN 10025-3 S420NL specifies Nb, V, Ni, N which are not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can EN 10025-3 S420NL Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-3 S420NL and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-3 S420NL and AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-3 S420NL specifies Nb, V, Ni, N which are not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can EN 10025-3 S420NL be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-3 S420NL and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.