Related Material — 67.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-3 S420JR (EN 10025-3:2019) and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-3 S420JR is typically used for used in bridges, heavy machinery frames, structural beams, offshore structures, and crane components., while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing.
EN 10025-3 S420JR is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-3 S420JR vs AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is a 95.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 11.1%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 67.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-3 S420JR
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Tensile Strength
520-680 MPa
440-600 MPa
Yield Strength
420 MPa min
300 MPa min
Elongation
17% min
22% min
Hardness
170-220 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10025-3 S420JR
Used in bridges, heavy machinery frames, structural beams, offshore structures, and crane components.
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing
Key Differences
EN 10025-3 S420JR specifies N which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can EN 10025-3 S420JR Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-3 S420JR and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-3 S420JR and AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-3 S420JR specifies N which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can EN 10025-3 S420JR be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-3 S420JR and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.