Related Material — 62.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-5 S355J2WP (EN 10025-5:2019) and EN 10025-5 S420J2W (EN 10025-5:2019) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering) category.
EN 10025-5 S355J2WP is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10025-5 S420J2W is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-5 S355J2WP vs EN 10025-5 S420J2W is a 81.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 22.8%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 62.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-5 S355J2WP
EN 10025-5 S420J2W
Tensile Strength
470-630 MPa
500-660 MPa
Yield Strength
>=355 MPa
>=420 MPa
Elongation
>=22%
>=19%
Condition
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm for yield, 3 to 100 mm for tensile, 3 to 40 mm for elongation (Lo = 5.65 sqrt(S0), longitudinal); transverse values are lower, see blocks
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm for yield, 3 to 100 mm for tensile, 3 to 40 mm for elongation (Lo = 5.65 sqrt(S0), longitudinal); transverse values are lower, see blocks
EN 10025-5 S420J2W specifies N which is not specified for EN 10025-5 S355J2WP.
Can EN 10025-5 S355J2WP Be Substituted With EN 10025-5 S420J2W?
EN 10025-5 S355J2WP and EN 10025-5 S420J2W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-5 S355J2WP and EN 10025-5 S420J2W?
EN 10025-5 S420J2W specifies N which is not specified for EN 10025-5 S355J2WP.
Can EN 10025-5 S355J2WP be substituted with EN 10025-5 S420J2W?
EN 10025-5 S355J2WP and EN 10025-5 S420J2W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.