Related Material — 65% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-3 P275NL1 (EN 10028-3:2017) and EN 10025-3 S275N (EN 10025-3:2019) are both steel grades.
EN 10028-3 P275NL1 is classified under Alloy Steel, while EN 10025-3 S275N is classified under Structural Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below.
EN 10028-3 P275NL1 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10025-3 S275N is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-3 P275NL1 vs EN 10025-3 S275N is a 85.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 95.2%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-3 P275NL1
EN 10025-3 S275N
Tensile Strength
390-510 MPa
370-510 MPa
Yield Strength
>=275 MPa
>=275 MPa
Elongation
>=24%
>=24%
Condition
Normalized, nominal thickness up to 16 mm
Normalized or normalized rolled (N), nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile strength up to 100 mm), Table 4
Typical Applications
EN 10028-3 P275NL1
Flat products for pressure equipment
EN 10025-3 S275N
Not documented
Key Differences
Different category: EN 10028-3 P275NL1 is Alloy Steel, EN 10025-3 S275N is Structural Steel.
Can EN 10028-3 P275NL1 Be Substituted With EN 10025-3 S275N?
EN 10028-3 P275NL1 and EN 10025-3 S275N share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-3 P275NL1 and EN 10025-3 S275N?
Different category: EN 10028-3 P275NL1 is Alloy Steel, EN 10025-3 S275N is Structural Steel.
Can EN 10028-3 P275NL1 be substituted with EN 10025-3 S275N?
EN 10028-3 P275NL1 and EN 10025-3 S275N share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.