Minimal Match — 44.7% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-3 P275NL2 (EN 10028-3:2017) and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10028-3 P275NL2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-3 P275NL2 vs IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is a 58.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 16.7%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 44.7%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-3 P275NL2
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Tensile Strength
390-510 MPa
410-590 MPa
Yield Strength
>=275 MPa
245 MPa min
Elongation
>=24%
>=18%
Condition
Normalized, nominal thickness up to 16 mm
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 50 mm
Izod Impact
Not specified
55 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=187 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10028-3 P275NL2
Flat products for pressure equipment
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10028-3 P275NL2 specifies Al, N, Cu, Nb which are not specified for IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10.
Can EN 10028-3 P275NL2 Be Substituted With IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
EN 10028-3 P275NL2 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-3 P275NL2 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
EN 10028-3 P275NL2 specifies Al, N, Cu, Nb which are not specified for IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10.
Can EN 10028-3 P275NL2 be substituted with IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
EN 10028-3 P275NL2 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.