Minimal Match — 45.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-3 P420NL1 (EN 10028-3:2017) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10028-3 P420NL1 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-3 P420NL1 vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 50.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 34.4%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 45.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-3 P420NL1
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Tensile Strength
540-690 MPa
380-550 MPa
Yield Strength
>=420 MPa
225 MPa min
Elongation
>=19%
>=19%
Condition
Normalized, nominal thickness up to 16 mm
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Izod Impact
Not specified
60 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10028-3 P420NL1
Flat products for pressure equipment
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10028-3 P420NL1 specifies Al, N, Cu, Nb which are not specified for IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6.
Can EN 10028-3 P420NL1 Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10028-3 P420NL1 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-3 P420NL1 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10028-3 P420NL1 specifies Al, N, Cu, Nb which are not specified for IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6.
Can EN 10028-3 P420NL1 be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10028-3 P420NL1 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.