Minimal Match — 49.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10028-3 P420NL2 (EN 10028-3:2017) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10028-3 P420NL2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10028-3 P420NL2 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 is a 49.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 49.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10028-3 P420NL2
IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6
Tensile Strength
540-690 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=420 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=19%
Not specified
Condition
Normalized, nominal thickness up to 16 mm
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10028-3 P420NL2
Flat products for pressure equipment
IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10028-3 P420NL2 specifies P, S, Al, N which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6.
Can EN 10028-3 P420NL2 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10028-3 P420NL2 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10028-3 P420NL2 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10028-3 P420NL2 specifies P, S, Al, N which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6.
Can EN 10028-3 P420NL2 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10028-3 P420NL2 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.