Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10083-1 34Cr4 (EN 10083-1:1991) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10083-1 34Cr4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10083-1 34Cr4 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 is a 81.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10083-1 34Cr4
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4
Condition
Quenched and tempered, ruling section d <= 16 mm
Not specified
Elongation
12% min
Not specified
Hardness
Soft annealed: 223 HB max
Not specified
Tensile Strength
900 to 1100 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
700 MPa min
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10083-1 34Cr4
Quenched and tempered machine parts; non alloy steels also normalized (clause 1)
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10083-1 34Cr4 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4.
Can EN 10083-1 34Cr4 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4?
EN 10083-1 34Cr4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10083-1 34Cr4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4?
EN 10083-1 34Cr4 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4.
Can EN 10083-1 34Cr4 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4?
EN 10083-1 34Cr4 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.