Minimal Match — 41.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6 (EN 10083-1:1991) and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6 vs IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is a 61.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 41.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Condition
Quenched and tempered, ruling section d <= 16 mm
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 50 mm
Elongation
9% min
>=18%
Hardness
Soft annealed: 248 HB max
Not specified
Tensile Strength
1200 to 1400 MPa
410-590 MPa
Yield Strength
1000 MPa min
245 MPa min
Izod Impact
Not specified
55 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=187 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6
Quenched and tempered machine parts; non alloy steels also normalized (clause 1)
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Not documented
Can EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6 Be Substituted With IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6 be substituted with IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
EN 10083-1 34CrNiMo6 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.