Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10083-1 41CrS4 (EN 10083-1:1996) and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10083-1 41CrS4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10083-1 41CrS4 vs IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is a 59.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10083-1 41CrS4
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Condition
Quenched and tempered, ruling section d <= 16 mm
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 50 mm
Elongation
11% min
>=18%
Hardness
Soft annealed: 241 HB max
Not specified
Tensile Strength
1000 to 1200 MPa
410-590 MPa
Yield Strength
800 MPa min
245 MPa min
Izod Impact
Not specified
55 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=187 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10083-1 41CrS4
Quenched and tempered machine parts (clause 1.1)
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Not documented
Key Differences
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for EN 10083-1 41CrS4.
Can EN 10083-1 41CrS4 Be Substituted With IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
EN 10083-1 41CrS4 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10083-1 41CrS4 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for EN 10083-1 41CrS4.
Can EN 10083-1 41CrS4 be substituted with IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
EN 10083-1 41CrS4 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.