Minimal Match — 41% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6 (EN 10083-3:2006) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6 vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 61.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 41%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Condition
Quenched and tempered (+QT), ruling section d <= 16 mm
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Elongation
10% min
>=19%
Hardness
Soft annealed (+A): 270 HBW max
Not specified
Tensile Strength
1080 to 1230 MPa
380-550 MPa
Yield Strength
880 MPa min
225 MPa min
Izod Impact
Not specified
60 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6
Quenched and tempered, flame or induction hardened machine parts (clause 1)
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Can EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6 Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6 be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10083-3 30NiCrMo16-6 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.