Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10083-3 38Cr2 (EN 10083-3:2006) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10083-3 38Cr2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10083-3 38Cr2 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 is a 72.7% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10083-3 38Cr2
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6
Condition
Quenched and tempered (+QT), ruling section d <= 16 mm
Not specified
Elongation
14% min
Not specified
Hardness
Soft annealed (+A): 207 HBW max
Not specified
Tensile Strength
800 to 950 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
550 MPa min
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10083-3 38Cr2
Quenched and tempered, flame or induction hardened machine parts (clause 1)
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10083-3 38Cr2 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6.
Can EN 10083-3 38Cr2 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6?
EN 10083-3 38Cr2 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10083-3 38Cr2 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6?
EN 10083-3 38Cr2 specifies P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6.
Can EN 10083-3 38Cr2 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6?
EN 10083-3 38Cr2 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.