Related Material — 69.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10083-3 51CrV4 (EN 10083-3:2006) and EN 10089 50CrV4 (EN 10089:2002) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Spring Steel category.
EN 10083-3 51CrV4 is typically used for valve springs, clutch springs, high duty coil springs, while EN 10089 50CrV4 is commonly used for valve springs, high duty coil springs, hand tools.
EN 10083-3 51CrV4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10089 50CrV4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10083-3 51CrV4 vs EN 10089 50CrV4 is a 91.2% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 25%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10083-3 51CrV4
EN 10089 50CrV4
Condition
Quenched and tempered (+QT), ruling section d <= 16 mm
Not specified
Elongation
9% min
≥8%
Hardness
Soft annealed (+A): 248 HBW max
321–375 HB
Tensile Strength
1100 to 1300 MPa
1100–1300 MPa
Yield Strength
900 MPa min
≥1000 MPa
Typical Applications
EN 10083-3 51CrV4
Valve springs, clutch springs, high duty coil springs
EN 10089 50CrV4
Valve springs, high duty coil springs, hand tools
Key Differences
EN 10083-3 51CrV4 specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10089 50CrV4.
Can EN 10083-3 51CrV4 Be Substituted With EN 10089 50CrV4?
EN 10083-3 51CrV4 and EN 10089 50CrV4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10083-3 51CrV4 and EN 10089 50CrV4?
EN 10083-3 51CrV4 specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10089 50CrV4.
Can EN 10083-3 51CrV4 be substituted with EN 10089 50CrV4?
EN 10083-3 51CrV4 and EN 10089 50CrV4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.