Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10084 20MnCr5 (EN 10084:2008) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10084 20MnCr5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10084 20MnCr5 vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 58.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10084 20MnCr5
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Condition
Soft annealed
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Hardenability
+H band at 1.5 mm from the quenched end: 41 to 49 HRC
Not specified
Hardness
Soft annealed: 217 HB max
Not specified
Tensile Strength
Not specified
380-550 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
225 MPa min
Elongation
Not specified
>=19%
Izod Impact
Not specified
60 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10084 20MnCr5
Gears, shafts, cams, case hardened parts
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for EN 10084 20MnCr5.
Can EN 10084 20MnCr5 Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10084 20MnCr5 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10084 20MnCr5 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for EN 10084 20MnCr5.
Can EN 10084 20MnCr5 be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10084 20MnCr5 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.