Minimal Match — 37.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2 (EN 10084:2008) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2 vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 56.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 37.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Condition
Soft annealed
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Hardenability
+H band at 1.5 mm from the quenched end: 41 to 49 HRC
Not specified
Hardness
Soft annealed: 212 HB max
Not specified
Tensile Strength
Not specified
380-550 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
225 MPa min
Elongation
Not specified
>=19%
Izod Impact
Not specified
60 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2
Gears, shafts and automotive transmission components
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Can EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2 Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2 be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN 10084 20NiCrMo2-2 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.