Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 (EN 10088-1:2014) and EN 10088-1 1.4301 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 vs EN 10088-1 1.4301 is a 50.8% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Tensile Strength
Not specified
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
≥210 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
≥45%
Hardness
Not specified
≤215 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5
Not documented
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 specifies Mo, N, Cu which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4301.
Can EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4301?
EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 and EN 10088-1 1.4301?
EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 specifies Mo, N, Cu which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4301.
Can EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4301?
EN 10088-1 X1NiCrMoCu25-20-5 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.